or how to ‘change’ Water into Wine …
                 and then, with time, the Wine might turn into a wonderful Vinegar !

… isn’t it the WATER that changes everything,
                                                    keeps everything alive,
                                                                         going and ‘flowing’…

 

The problem with our civilization is that we are trapped in a belief system or ideology that is deeply rooted
in an abstract thinking pattern that might have worked in a technological sense – way back then – but has
failed us significantly in every other area, from socio-ecological cognition to the maturation & development
of our economic sense & sapience.

Socio-ecological cognition is the study of how people think and interact with their social and physical environments.
It combines social cognition, which is the study of how people process social information, with the socio-ecological
perspective, which is the study of how people are affected by their social and environmental interactions.

Explanation :
Cognitive ecology: the study of how cognition evolves and is shaped by the environment. It combines
ideas from cognitive science, evolutionary biology, anthropology, and ecological psychology.

Social cognition: The mental processes that allow people to interact with others, including perceiving,
interpreting, and processing social information.

Socioecological perspective: The idea that people are affected by and affect a complex range of social
and environmental interactions.

Socioecological psychology: The study of how people adapt to their physical, interpersonal, economic,
and political environments.

As we created a world of delusion with ‘true’ values and ‘laws of stability’ by applying
strict outlines & time-frames to the ‘matrix’, the logical fallacies and cognitive biases
of these dichotomous bifurcations corrupted our way of thinking and ‘contaminated’
our ‘common sense’.

 

 

This ‘Transcription’ or alteration of our multisensory perception, manipulated our collective consciousness
and indoctrinated us with some bipolar ideologies of a ‘monotone’ & linear-hierarchic world order that
fractured our whole socio-ecological coherence & harmony.

 

The redefinition of Life & Reality, with all its Law & Order of ‘appropriation’, now ‘set-in-stone’,
prompted all kinds of psycho-physical dissociation & fragmentation; Separating our emotions from
‘rational intelligence’ rendered us social-emotional illiterate & incompetent, caused a profound
socio-ecological desensitization and turned us into a now incongruent species.

There’s no doubt, algorithms became the key to the technological rise of our species. But, with its
abstract nature we created an artificial world that affected not only our environmental perception
and the way we thinking but also redesigned & altered our intellectual matrix, our ‘Intelligence’.
Now we find ourselves living in a fantasy world of our own construction and all the fallout of this
socio-economically ‘engineered’ figment where values and meanings lost their socio-ecological
foundation & relevance, and became fallacious in terms & conditions.

That’s where we need to ‘tackle’ the ‘whole issue’ linguistically, analyze the etymo-logical
meaning and ancestral ‘sapience’ behind the logistics and the terms that shape our existence
more than we are aware of.

So, what do we mean when we talk about Change,
and what does ‘Change’ really means in the socio-ecological
context of a non-linear, non-hierarchical world ?

 

Synonyms for change: adjustment, correction, development, difference, modification, modulation, mutation, permutation, PROGRESS, revision, shift, switch, turn, variance, etc.
In contrast and in our dichotomic, dualistic fashion we have the
Antonyms of change: fixation, solidity PERMANENCE, stability, etc

If we think of change in terms of shifting, we need to understand that in ecological sense,
or real life, there’s nothing to ‘return’ to, no new beginning or karmic rebirth to fall back on.

All attempt to ‘go back’, return to better ways or times, ended up to be just a repetition,
revanchistic and reactionary in character and deed.

The term ‘Change’ belongs to an abstract, dichotomous concept that distinguishes between moving,
continuing, evolving, going into the future or the ‘Next’ and an ‘arrested development’,
a still, stop or ‘Halt’ (HLT).